The jury is still out. More high-quality studies are required.
« From more than 20 000 unique abstracts, fewer than 100 studies met their eligibility criteria for the systematic review and only 25 met their inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. These 25 studies compared the performance of deep learning solutions to health-care professionals for 13 different specialty areas, only two of which—breast cancer and dermatological cancers—were represented by more than three studies. »
in The Lancet digital health